Posted November 3, 2011

WELKOM – BIENVENUE – 歓迎 – Добро пожаловать – Υποδοχή – Willkommen – 환영 – BENVENUTO

 

Visas and Status, Generally

Time is an elemental concept of the U.S. immigration system. For foreign visitors, the two words most often preceding an immigration question are “how long. . . ?” This is a pertinent inquiry, as a visa and one’s visa ‘status’ in the United States, although distinct in form, are alike in one important respect: both can expire at any given time based on complex rules intended to govern the foreigner’s actions within the country. Conversely, one may expire while the other remains valid. This layered permission aspect of U.S. immigration can and often does cause confusion and problems.

If you are a foreigner physically present in the United States, it is important to distinguish your status from your visa. The visa in your passport is much like a ticket, or a license, which, if granted (usually by a U.S. consulate or embassy abroad) merely allows you to apply for admission at a U.S. port-of-entry, under assumed qualifications based on your expressed intent in applying for the visa. A visa allows this application at the port-of-entry, but does not guarantee your lawful presence in the United States after entry. Your ability to maintain lawful presence in the United States under a particular visa category (B-2, J-1, H-1B, etc.) is governed after entry by rules related to your actual ‘status.’

If you are in the U.S. temporarily, such as a temporary worker, student, or visitor for business or pleasure, you possess non-immigrant status.  If you are in the U.S. with the intent of eventually obtaining permanent residence, you possess immigrant status.  Status, as such, is the initial focal point for legal analysis related to any foreigner’s current immigration circumstances and goals moving forward.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
 

Oct. 24, 2011 – A recent legislative proposal by Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Mike Lee (R-UT) has received considerable attention for its originality, if not its audacity.  Under the “Increasing Home Ownership for Priority Visitors” program, foreigners could obtain a three-year visa to allow presence (but not employment) in the U.S. in exchange for purchasing real property valued at $500,000 or greater and residing there a minimum of six months a year.  While this proposal scores points for originality by addressing two pressing issues (immigration reform and the housing crisis), most practitioners will tell you that as-yet-revealed details of this proposal will likely underscore vast weaknesses as a workable visa category.  Would tracks of foreclosed homes become havens for wealthy Saudi or Chinese investors?  How do you verify the six-month residence requirement without adding bureacracy?  If employment authorization is not embedded, why would wealthy foreigners be satisfied at buying a six-month vacation home with a likely negligible ROI?  Could they obtain dual status to work?  Bottom line: Don’t hold your breath, Donald Trumpski.

In a surprise ruling that further empowers states’ rights to control immigration, U.S. District Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn left intact most provisions of a Alabama law that goes further than federal law in restricting access to public benefits and providing grounds for the arrest and detention of suspected illegal immigrants by local law enforcement officers.  A challenge to the recently-passed law was brought by the Department of Justice and a coalition of civil rights groups.  While striking down some provisions, such as the proposed restriction of access to public universities, Judge  Lovelace Blackburn upheld most other provisions, including making application for a driver’s license or vehicle registration by illegal immigrants a felony; requiring schools to check the immigration status of children; allowing for the arrest and detention of suspected illegal immigrants by local law enforcement; and nullifying private contracts (such as leases) knowingly entered into with illegal aliens.  This judicial development creates further conflict between the federal immigration system and increasingly assertive states’ rights, a growing schism likely headed to SCOTUS for resolution.  From The Huntsville Times.

The Department of Homeland Security has increased national security reviews of travelers who overstay their visas, including cross-checking individuals with interagency databases. Announcing a program that effectively started this past spring, DHS deputy counterterrorism coordinator John Cohen revealed that a recent check of 1.6 million overstay records resulted in follow up investigations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents of almost 2,000 individuals deemed possible threats to national security or public safety. The program, initially recommended by the 9/11 Commission in response to the terrorist hijackers who overstayed their visas, is expected to continue for the indefinite future. From the New York Daily News.

Tagged with: