In the latest round of dueling press releases disguised as serious legislative action, the House of Representatives this week passed the ENFORCE the Law Act of 2014 (H.R. 4138), a Moses-like edict to the president to obey the law, to which the president quickly answered with a public event in the ornate East Room of the White House where he promised to kick illegal aliens out of the country more humanely.

ENFORCE in this instance stands for Executive Needs to Faithfully Observe and Respect Congressional Enactments.  At best, one can applaud House Republicans for scrounging in their late-night scrabble for a suitable ‘R’ in this farcical legislative proposal.

Pres. Obama, meanwhile, has linked arms with the Hispanic caucus and confessed his true obsession: that he’d rather be Pope than President.

Continue reading »

. . . stimulate investment, and promote specialization that in the long run boosts productivity. . .  there is no evidence that these effects take place at the expense of jobs for workers born in the United States.”

So says economist Giovanni Pero of the University of California, Davis, in a report on the impact of the H-1B visa published by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

This Forbes article highlights differing approaches to the H-1B (or lack thereof) problem by the House of Representatives and Senate.  The House’s ‘Skills Visa Act’ removes barriers to IT outplacement firms currently facing H-1B dependency restrictions.  The Senate Bill, famously passed last June but which languishes somewhere deep in the Milky Way, keeps the screws to H-1B dependent employers.  Senate Democrats surely insist.

These seemingly subtle differences differences reflect fragmented policy approaches to the economics of immigration.  Protectionism complicates progress in a global economy.  To some, America’s composition is at issue.  To others, competitiveness.  The sensible approach incorporates both policy prescriptions without pandering to special interests (unions, primarily) or xenophobia.  The Great Immigration Stalemate continues.

Tagged with:
 

Legislation requires consensus, or should anyway, and we still don’t have it.  Odds for sensible immigration reform in the USA near term remain decent, yet certifiably longer than they were following passage of the Senate bill in June.  To blame: ongoing debt battles, a government shutdown and pillowfights over the Affordable Care Act, aka ObamaCare.

President Obama declares immigration reform is his top priority, and surely it is.  The 113th Congress is in session.  Fall is in the air, amber leaves, wool sweaters, promises of sitting down to turkey after making peace with our neighbors.  Here we go. . .  the latest proposition emerges from Rep. Darrell Issa’s office in the House of Representatives.  Darrell, a Republican, represents a relatively conservative and affluent district, the San Diego north coast.  I personally met with the congressman in his office over the status of immigration law during an AILA lobby day ten years ago.  At any rate (he mostly ignored me), Mr. Issa plans to introduce a bill that would allow a time-limited legal status – six years – to undocumented persons in the country to advance their eligibility to permanently and lawfully immigrate.

Continue reading »

 

Note to Followers

Posted September 12, 2013

Update of the Twitter API is on its way, along with a revamp of site content.  With massive changes looming in U.S. immigration law, we’re refitting the vessel.  Thanks for your patience.

Registered Provisional Immigrant (RPI) status: Inadmissibility changes will be key to understanding your place in line. Stay tuned and stay out of trouble.

Same Sex Couples: see below.

Vote NO on California AB 1159.

~ FRW